<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article article-type="normal" xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PALEVO</journal-id>
         <issn>1631-0683</issn>
         <publisher>
            <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
         </publisher>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(15)00009-3</article-id>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crpv.2015.01.001</article-id>
         <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="type">
               <subject>Research article</subject>
            </subj-group>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
               <subject>General Palaeontology, Systematic and Evolution (Palaeoecology)</subject>
            </subj-group>
         </article-categories>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Microstructural features of the femur in early ophiacodontids: A reappraisal of ancestral habitat use and lifestyle of amniotes</article-title>
            <trans-title-group xml:lang="fr">
               <trans-title>Caractères microstructuraux du fémur chez les premiers ophiacodontes : réexamen du mode de vie ancestral des amniotes</trans-title>
            </trans-title-group>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="editors">
            <contrib contrib-type="editor">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>Michel</given-names>
               </name>
               <email/>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="editor">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>Jorge</given-names>
               </name>
               <email/>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="authors">
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>Michel</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>Vivian</given-names>
               </name>
               <email>vdebuff@mnhn.fr</email>
            </contrib>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0005">
               <aff> UMR 7207, Centre de recherches sur la paléobiodiversité et les paléoenvironnements, Sorbonne Universités, CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, département “Histoire de la Terre”, bâtiment de géologie, case postale 48, 57, rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France</aff>
               <aff>
                  <institution>UMR 7207, Centre de recherches sur la paléobiodiversité et les paléoenvironnements, Sorbonne Universités, CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, département “Histoire de la Terre”, bâtiment de géologie, case postale 48</institution>
                  <addr-line>57, rue Cuvier</addr-line>
                  <city>Paris cedex 05</city>
                  <postal-code>75231</postal-code>
                  <country>France</country>
               </aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
         </contrib-group>
         <pub-date-not-available/>
         <volume>15</volume>
         <issue seq="12">1-2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(16)X0002-4</issue-id>
         <issue-title>Current advances in paleohistology: A tribute to a generation of Frenchpaleohistologists</issue-title>
         <fpage seq="0" content-type="normal">115</fpage>
         <lpage content-type="normal">127</lpage>
         <history>
            <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-12-03"/>
            <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2015-01-22"/>
         </history>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2015 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
            <copyright-holder>Académie des sciences</copyright-holder>
         </permissions>
         <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="application/pdf" xlink:href="main.pdf">
                        Full (PDF)
                    </self-uri>
         <abstract abstract-type="author">
            <p id="spar0005">Ophiacodontids have long been considered the basalmost synapsids, and to have retained a fairly aquatic, piscivorous lifestyle typical of stem-amniotes. A restudy of their bone histology and microanatomy shows that <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic>, a Late Carboniferous ophiacodontid, has a thin, compact cortex and lacks a medullary spongiosa, two features that suggest a truly terrestrial lifestyle. The Early Permian <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> has a thicker cortex with a few resorption cavities and bone trabeculae surrounding the free medullary cavity. An inference model yields a terrestrial lifestyle for both taxa, though <italic>O. uniformis</italic> may have been slightly more aquatic (possibly amphibious) than <italic>C. collettii</italic>. However, an optimization of inferred lifestyle of other early stegocephalians (based on bone microanatomy) suggests that the first amniotes were terrestrial. The potentially amphibious lifestyle of <italic>O. uniformis</italic>, though not supported by our inference model, would thus be secondary. Histological features of femoral cortices in these two taxa closely resemble those previously described in extant species of large varanids and teids. This similarity, along with other comparative elements, is discussed in reference to the possible growth patterns and life history traits of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> and <italic>O. uniformis</italic>.</p>
         </abstract>
         <trans-abstract abstract-type="author" xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0010">Les ophiacodontidés ont longtemps été considérés comme les synapsidés les plus basaux et on leur a longtemps attribué le mode de vie aquatique et le régime piscivore typique des premiers amniotes-souches. Cette étude de micro-anatomie et d’histologie osseuse montre que le fémur de <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic>, un taxon du Carbonifère supérieur, possède un cortex compact peu épais et est dépourvu de spongieuse médullaire, deux caractères indicatifs d’un mode de vie franchement terrestre. <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>, du Permien inférieur, a un cortex plus épais avec quelques lacunes de résorption, ainsi que des travées osseuses autour de la cavité médullaire. L’usage d’un modèle d’inférence conduit à attribuer un mode de vie terrestre à ces deux taxons, encore que <italic>O. uniformis</italic> ait pu être un peu plus aquatique (peut-être amphibie) que <italic>C. collettii</italic>. Cependant, l’optimisation des inférences de mode de vie effectuées chez d’autres stégocéphales en référence à la micro-anatomie de leurs os suggère que les premiers amniotes étaient terrestres. D’éventuelles mœurs amphibies chez <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> (bien qu’elles ne soient pas confirmées par l’emploi de nos modèles d’inférence) seraient donc secondaires. Les caractères histologiques du fémur dans les deux taxons étudiés ici rappellent fortement ceux attribués dans la littérature aux grands varanidés et téidés. Cette similitude, ainsi que d’autres éléments comparatifs, est discutée en référence aux modèles de croissance et aux traits d’histoire de vie qui pourraient être attribués à <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> et à <italic>O. uniformis</italic>.</p>
         </trans-abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <unstructured-kwd-group>
               <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>, <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>, Bone microanatomy, Bone histology, Lifestyle inference, Growth pattern, Paleobiology</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <kwd-group xml:lang="fr">
            <unstructured-kwd-group>
               <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>, <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>, Micro-anatomie osseuse, Histologie osseuse, Inférence de mode de vie, Patron de croissance, Paléobiologie</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <custom-meta-group>
            <custom-meta>
               <meta-name>presented</meta-name>
               <meta-value>Handled by Michel Laurin</meta-value>
            </custom-meta>
         </custom-meta-group>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body>
      <sec id="sec0005">
         <label>1</label>
         <title id="sect0025">Introduction</title>
         <p id="par0005">Extant amniotes include mostly terrestrial taxa, but does this reflect the initial amniotic condition? The amniotic egg is usually viewed as a useful, though not necessary adaptation to a terrestrial lifestyle (<xref rid="bib0315" ref-type="bibr">Skulan, 2000</xref>). However, even if we provisionally accept the current wisdom that the amniotic egg is a terrestrial adaptation, this does not necessarily imply that the first amniotes were terrestrial for their entire life cycle. Indeed, <xref rid="bib0290" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1957</xref> and <xref rid="bib0295" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1958</xref> thought that the first amniotes were still amphibious, perhaps even mostly aquatic taxa, and that they laid their eggs on land because it was a safer environment, with less predator pressure, than the aquatic environment. Even today, in at least some environments, there are apparently advantages in laying eggs outside water because some amphibians have adapted to lay eggs in this way (<xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Martin and Carter, 2013</xref>). The benefit of laying eggs on land would have increased the farther we go back in time because there were fewer terrestrial predators back then (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2010</xref>, <xref rid="bib0290" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1957</xref> and <xref rid="bib0295" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1958</xref>). Laying terrestrial eggs is also advantageous in alpine environments, in which eggs risk being swept away by the fast current, and this has led to the suggestion that this hazard may have been the selective pressure that led to the appearance of the amniotic egg (<xref rid="bib0150" ref-type="bibr">Goin and Goin, 1962</xref>). Although these considerations suggest that the amniotic egg is obviously optimized for terrestrial reproduction, they do not necessarily imply that the first amniotes were terrestrial animals.</p>
         <p id="par0010">What does the fossil record tell us about the lifestyle of the earliest amniotes? Ichnological evidence suggests that some Carboniferous stegocephalians ventured onto land (<xref rid="bib0195" ref-type="bibr">Keighley et al., 2008</xref>), even though this does not rule out the possibility that these taxa were still largely amphibious, if not mostly aquatic. Furthermore, trackways can be deposited underwater (<xref rid="bib0010" ref-type="bibr">Brand, 1992</xref> and <xref rid="bib0015" ref-type="bibr">Brand and Tang, 1991</xref>), so it is not obvious how reliable such ichnological data are to infer habitat use in long-extinct taxa. This interpretation is supported by the recent discovery of Middle Devonian stegocephalian trackways, probably produced by a taxon that was still largely aquatic (<xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Niedzwiedzki et al., 2010</xref>). The oldest known unequivocal amniote skeletal remains are from Joggins, Nova Scotia (<xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Carroll, 1964</xref>), and date back to the Early Pennsylvanian, about 315–316 Ma (<xref rid="bib0025" ref-type="bibr">Calder et al., 2005</xref>), Late Bashkirian to Early Moscovian (<xref rid="bib0155" ref-type="bibr">Gradstein et al., 2012</xref>). Most stegocephalians found in Joggins may have been terrestrial, based on their morphology, but the fact that most fossils were preserved in tree stumps raises the possibility that the Joggins thanatocoenosis is a biased sample of the biocoenosis that it represents.</p>
         <p id="par0015">The scant skeletal remains found in Joggins, combined with unfavorable preservation (appendicular long bones are strongly flattened; ML, personal observation) has so far prevented the use of other types of data, such as bone microanatomy, to corroborate previous interpretations about the lifestyle of the stegocephalians found in Joggins. However, long bone microanatomy of slightly more recent, Permo-Carboniferous stegocephalians, including amniotes, has started yielding clues about the lifestyle of the first amniotes (<xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Canoville and Laurin, 2010</xref>, <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin, 2005</xref>, <xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Huttenlocker and Rega, 2012</xref>, <xref rid="bib0200" ref-type="bibr">Kriloff et al., 2008</xref>, <xref rid="bib0225" ref-type="bibr">Laurin et al., 2004</xref> and <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al., 2013</xref>). Among Permo-Carboniferous amniotes, ophiacodontids are especially relevant to assess the primitive amniotic condition, for two reasons. First, <xref rid="bib0300" ref-type="bibr">Romer (1961)</xref> viewed ophiacodontids as aquatic to amphibious, piscivorous taxa. Second, ophiacodontids are historically important: following <xref rid="bib0300" ref-type="bibr">Romer (1961)</xref>, they have indeed been supposed to be the basalmost synapsids (in fact, Romer considered them to be the ancestral stock of other synapsids), a viewpoint that was upheld much more recently by <xref rid="bib0040" ref-type="bibr">Carroll (1988)</xref>. Several more recent explicit phylogenetic analyses (<xref rid="bib0210" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 1993</xref>, <xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz, 1986</xref> and <xref rid="bib0280" ref-type="bibr">Reisz et al., 1992</xref>) have not supported this conclusion, and placed ophiacodontids among eupelycosaurs, though <xref rid="bib0005" ref-type="bibr">Benson (2012: fig. 2C)</xref> found some support for a very basal position of this taxon. Ophiacodontids thus formed a cornerstone of Romer's scenario about the origin of amniotes, along with the apparently amphibious to aquatic diadectomorph <italic>Limnoscelis paludis</italic> (<xref rid="bib0285" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1946</xref>), and they remain important to assess the primitive lifestyle of amniotes and synapsids even under recent phylogenies.</p>
         <p id="par0020">The question, however, proves to be complex and a recent morphometric study of the <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> spine (<xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Felice and Angielczyk, 2014</xref>) failed to reach a clear-cut, unambiguous conclusion on this topic. Below, we test <xref rid="bib0290" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1957</xref> and <xref rid="bib0295" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1958</xref>, and <xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Felice and Angielczyk's (2014)</xref> ideas about the lifestyle of ophiacodontids, through a microanatomical study of two taxa of different geological ages: the Late Carboniferous <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> and the Early Permian <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>. We hypothesize, because of the difference in geological age between both taxa (at least 15 Ma; see below), that <italic>C. collettii</italic> retains a lifestyle closer to that of the earliest ophiacodontids and probably of the earliest amniotes as well, than <italic>O. uniformis</italic>. We also take this opportunity to further describe their histology, in complement to previous descriptions by <xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Enlow and Brown (1957)</xref> and <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès (1974)</xref>, as this can yield clues about their growth pattern and possible metabolism. Finally, we provide an update about what quantitative inference models based on bone microanatomy imply about the evolution of lifestyle. The last published synthesis of these results harks back to <xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Canoville and Laurin (2010: fig. 8)</xref>, so an update is timely.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0010">
         <label>2</label>
         <title id="sect0030">Materials and methods</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0025">The specimens sectioned belong to two taxa, <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> and <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>. The <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> femur, Yale Peabody Museum (YPM) VP 056583 was identified in the collection as “<italic>Clepsydrops</italic> sp.”, but the specimen is from Vermilion County, Danville, where only <italic>C. collettii</italic> and <italic>C. vinslovii</italic> are recorded, and <xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz (1986)</xref> indicates that the latter is probably a junior synonym of <italic>C. collettii</italic>. Therefore, this specimen will tentatively be attributed to <italic>C. collettii</italic>. It is a perfectly preserved 56.8 mm long bone. The Danville locality (Illinois) is part of the McLeansboro group (<xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz, 1986</xref>), which is Middle Pennsylvanian, Late Desmoinesian, (<xref rid="bib0170" ref-type="bibr">Hatch and Affolter, 2002</xref>), equivalent to Late Moscovian to Early Kasimovian, about 307 Ma (<xref rid="bib0080" ref-type="bibr">Davydov et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0030">The <italic>O. uniformis</italic> femur, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (CM) Vertebrate Paleontology (VP) 9528 is also an entire bone (104.2 mm long), in excellent conservation state. It is from the Briar Creek bonebed, Admiral Formation, Artinskian (<xref rid="bib0240" ref-type="bibr">Lucas, 2006</xref>), about 288–279 Ma (<xref rid="bib0175" ref-type="bibr">Henderson et al., 2012</xref>). It is thus among the geologically oldest specimens of <italic>O. uniformis</italic> because this taxon is known from the Putnam formation, Early Artinskian, to the Clyde formation (<xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz, 1986</xref>), Early Kungurian (<xref rid="bib0240" ref-type="bibr">Lucas, 2006</xref>). This taxon thus ranges from about 290 Ma to about 276 Ma.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0035">We also illustrate the <italic>O. retroversus</italic> radius that was used by <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin (2005)</xref> to infer the lifestyle of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>, but not illustrated in that paper. It comes from the Rattlesnake Canyon, Archer County, Admiral Formation, and is thus approximately contemporary with the <italic>O. uniformis</italic> whose femur we sampled. A histological and microanatomical description of the bone was published, in French, by <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès (1974)</xref>, who produced the section (number 291.1.2 T, in his collection). Below, we provide a brief description of this bone, for comparative purposes.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0040">Digital pictures of mid-diaphyseal cross-sections (thickness 80 to 100 μm) of the bones were binarized to be analyzed by Bone Profiler (<xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Girondot and Laurin, 2003</xref>), in order to obtain compactness profiles. These data were then used to obtain inferences about the lifestyle of ophiacodontids using the ternary inference model based on the femur produced by <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al. (2013)</xref>. This model requires data on snout-vent length (<xref rid="sec0065" ref-type="sec">Supplementary On line Materials [SOM]</xref>). We do not have the exact length for the specimens used, but the literature includes many such estimates for several taxa, including <italic>O. uniformis</italic>, whose adult size is estimated at 666 mm snout-vent length (SVL) by <xref rid="bib0305" ref-type="bibr">Romer and Price (1940)</xref>. For <italic>C. collettii</italic>, we did not find precise estimates in the literature, but assuming that it is indeed an ophiacodontid (<xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz, 1986</xref>), and assuming isometry between femoral mid-diaphyseal diameter and snout-vent length, we estimate that our <italic>C. collettii</italic> specimen would have been about half as long as the <italic>O. uniformis</italic> specimen, i.e. some 333 mm SVL. Our snout-vent length estimates are thus only approximate, but we tested values ± 50% around our estimate, and this did not change the inferred lifestyle, so the latter can be considered robust to body size errors.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0045">Additional sagittal (longitudinal) sections in the diaphyseal and metaphyseal regions of both specimens were made to complement histological observations. The latter involved light microscopy in ordinary and polarized light at low (× 25) to medium (× 400) magnification using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope. All measurements of sectional dimensions were performed with the software Image J (National Institute of the Health, USA) on either microphotographs or digitalized line drawings of the sections (enlargements × 12 to × 240). The vocabulary used for describing the microanatomical and histological features of bone refers to <xref rid="bib0135" ref-type="bibr">Francillon-Vieillot et al. (1990)</xref>, and to <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Prondvai et al. (2014)</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0015">
         <label>3</label>
         <title id="sect0035">Results</title>
         <sec id="sec0020">
            <label>3.1</label>
            <title id="sect0040">Microanatomical description</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0050">The <italic>C. collettii</italic> femur has a simple, nearly tubular shaft structure (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>A). Only a few, small resorption cavities can be seen, most of which are clustered close to the three short, thin bone trabeculae that protrude into the medullary cavity. The cortex is thin and its mean thickness, 0.82 mm (i.e. 23.7% of mean diaphyseal radius), is relatively uniform.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0055">The femur of <italic>O. uniformis</italic> is about twice as large as that of <italic>C. collettii</italic>, and has a more complex structure (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>B). Its cortex is much thicker (3.05 mm; 51% of mean diaphyseal radius), but this bone is not osteosclerotic because a well-developed medullary cavity is present, and the cortex is abundantly vascularized. Numerous small to mid-sized resorption cavities are present, especially around the medullary cavity and in the adductor crest. Several short, relatively thick trabeculae surround the medullary cavity on about half of its periphery, but none extends deep within it.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0060">The differences evoked above are reflected by compactness profiles (<xref rid="tbl0005" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref> and <xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>); <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> has a much greater value of parameter <italic>P</italic> (the position of the inflexion point that marks the transition between cortex and medulla; <xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>A) than <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>B). Both taxa have a Min value (lower asymptote) at essentially 0, and a Max value (upper asymptote) near 1, although a little lower in <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>, because of a denser cortical vascularization (<xref rid="tbl0005" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). The value of parameter <italic>S</italic> (steepness of the transition between Min and Max) for <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> (0.012) is low, which reflects an abrupt transition between the cortex and the medulla and a fairly even thickness of the cortex. A low value of this parameter is typical of terrestrial and (to a lesser extent) amphibious taxa (supplementary on line Table 2 of <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al., 2013</xref>). The <italic>S</italic> value for <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> (0.047), though clearly higher, remains inside the range (0.008 ≤ <italic>S</italic> ≤ 0.13) that characterizes the femur of terrestrial taxa (<xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0025">
            <label>3.2</label>
            <title id="sect0045">Histological features of the femora</title>
            <sec id="sec0030">
               <label>3.2.1</label>
               <title id="sect0050">Clepsydrops</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0065">In both cross (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A) and sagittal (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>B) sections, the thin cortex of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> femur shows a deep layer made of an osseous tissue with low, or no, birefringence, and a more peripheral layer with clear birefringence and a faint subdivision into bone lamellae. Osteocyte lacunae are ovoid or multipolar with short canaliculi in the deep layer, while those in the superficial strata are flat and have no canaliculi (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>C). These characteristics suggest that the deep cortex consists of an osseous type akin to the woven-fibered type, and that more peripheral layers are made of a parallel-fibered tissue that turns into true lamellar bone towards the outer margins of the cortex. The transition between these layers is gradual, and the central part of the cortex displays characteristics between the two histological types described above. Vascularization in the deep cortex basically consists of primary osteons whose spatial density can reach 80 units/mm<sup>2</sup>, and whose lumen is 25 to 30 μm in average diameter (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A, D, E). Osteon orientation is mainly longitudinal (i.e. parallel to the long axis of the bone) and in some sectors of the cross-sections, the osteons tend to be disposed in radial files, each including 4 to 6 subsequent osteons (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>D). In other sectors, the osteons are more randomly distributed (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A and E). Vascular density decreases progressively towards bone periphery, as also the mean diameter of canal lumen (it falls down to 15 μm). Superficial cortical layers are poorly vascularized (vascular density &lt; 5 canals/mm<sup>2</sup>) or completely avascular in places (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>E). <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> femoral cortex displays neither cyclic growth marks, nor Sharpey's fibers. The deep (perimedullar) surface of the cortex displays local signs of resorption related to the widening of the medullary cavity (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>F). Conversely, in other sectors of the sections, the deep margin of the cortex is lined by a thin (50 to 150 μm in thickness) layer of endosteal, reconstructive lamellar tissue that was deposited after an episode of extensive resorption (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>D). There is no evidence of significant intracortical remodeling. The rare bone trabeculae protruding into the medullary cavity are thin (diameter 50 to 80 μm) and made of poorly remodeled parallel-fibered or lamellar bone tissues (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>G, H). None of them contains any residue of calcified cartilage.</p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="sec0035">
               <label>3.2.2</label>
               <title id="sect0055">Ophiacodon</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0070">The mid-diaphyseal sections examined here show a histological stratification of the femoral cortex into four concentric layers that are likely to reflect successive episodes of variation in the rate of periosteal bone accretion. The layers are numbered here from 1, for the deepest one, to 4 for the most superficial (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>A). Layers 1 and 3 show rather similar characteristics, and layers 2 and 4 are also histologically similar. Layers 1 and 3 are abundantly vascularized by simple vascular canals 20 to 40 μm in diameter, as also, in some sectors of the sections, by primary osteons (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>A–C, E, F). No evidence of intracortical Haversian substitution, resulting in regular secondary osteons, is noticeable in the specimen examined. However, the deepest layers of the cortex, in the vicinity of the medullary cavity, may display a few large erosion bays (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>F) whose walls were, in some cases, under reconstruction by secondary, endosteal deposits when the animal died. In layer 1, vascular density is relatively high (27 canals/mm<sup>2</sup>), and the main orientation of the canals is oblique and, to a lesser extent, longitudinal. Vascular canals are less numerous, but longer and more oblique in layer 3 (they become radial in this same layer in the adductor crest), where they tend to develop anastomoses and short ramifications (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>B, F, G). Layers 2 and 4 have a lesser vascular density (15 to 18 canals/mm<sup>2</sup>) and thinner canals (12 to 18 μm in diameter); in addition, the most peripheral part of layer 4, on a thickness of some 300 μm, is nearly avascular (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>G). Optic opacity in layers 1 and 3 is greater than in layers 2 and 4 (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>B). This aspect is related, for a part, to a high density in osteocyte lacunae and, for another part, to the spheroid or multipolar morphology of these lacunae; conversely, the lacunae are spindle-like or flat in layers 2 and 4 (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>D). The whole cortex of the <italic>O uniformis</italic> femur displays a mass birefringence (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>C and E) that reflects a relatively even orientation of collagen fibers. However, this reaction to polarized light is irregular in layers 1 and 3, especially in the region of the adductor crest. Layer 1 does not display any clear cyclic growth mark, which implies that growth would extend continuously in this whole layer (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>A, B, F). Layer 3 shows a faint and poorly defined indication of cyclic accretion (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>B, F, G). Conversely, two well-characterized <italic>annuli</italic> and two lines of arrested growth (LAGs) occur in layer 2, and nine to ten LAGs in layer 4 (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>F and G). The growth marks in layer 2, as also the first four LAGs in layer 4, are broadly, but evenly spaced, with intervals of 129 μm in the average in layer 2, and 110 μm to 203 μm in layer 4. The last six marks in layer 4 are tightly grouped, and have a relatively constant interval of some 26 μm indicating sustained, though very slow, growth activity during this last stage (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref> and <xref rid="fig0025" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5</xref>). Mean apposition rate can be estimated to some 0.07 μm/day during this last stage, which is obviously an underestimation because the presence of LAGs indicates that active growth occurred during a part of the year only. A true speed twice as high, or 0.14 μm/day, is conceivable with reference to <xref rid="bib0205" ref-type="bibr">Lance's (2003)</xref> observations revealing an active growth period of 6 months only in extant alligator populations.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0075">On the diaphyseal face opposite to the adductor crest, the medullary cavity is lined by a thin layer of secondary lamellar bone separated from the rest of the cortex by a reversion line. The other face of the medullary cavity, under the adductor crest, is devoid of this reconstructive layer but shows signs of resorption. By the time the animal died, the expansion of the medullary cavity was thus asymmetric, with a drift in the ventral direction. There is no trace of calcified cartilage matrix within the trabeculae protruding into the medullary cavity.</p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0040">
            <label>3.3</label>
            <title id="sect0060">Lifestyle inferences</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0080">The ternary inference model from <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al. (2013)</xref> yields a terrestrial lifestyle for both <italic>C. collettii</italic> and <italic>O. uniformis</italic>. The binary model yields an amphibious to terrestrial lifestyle (SOM) for both taxa (the alternative state, aquatic, being thus excluded).</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0045">
         <label>4</label>
         <title id="sect0065">Discussion</title>
         <sec id="sec0050">
            <label>4.1</label>
            <title id="sect0070">Comparative data on bone histology</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0085">To our knowledge, long bone structure in <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> has never been described. Conversely, descriptions of the histological features of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> long bones have been published by <xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Enlow and Brown (1957)</xref>, about a rib and an undetermined long bone, and <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès (1974)</xref> about a radius, in <italic>O. retroversus</italic> (see also the recent synthesis by <xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Huttenlocker and Rega, 2012</xref>). These studies had convergent results: <italic>O. retroversus</italic> bone cortices are basically composed of an abundantly vascularized (simple vascular canals and primary osteons) parallel-fibered tissue that tends to turn into true lamellar bone towards cortical periphery. Such a structure is in good agreement with the results of the present study. Some differences nevertheless distinguish the femur of <italic>O. uniformis</italic> studied here from the bones of <italic>O. retroversus</italic>. The latter display only longitudinal non-anastomosed vascular canals, whereas our specimen also displays oblique and radial canals that are frequently anastomosed. The density of vascular canals, as also their orientation, can vary between the bones of a single skeleton, or even between the different sectors of a single section (e.g., <xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil et al., 2008</xref>, and the results of the present study); a difference in these features between, for example, the femur and the radius is therefore unsurprising when two distinct taxa are considered. Moreover, the unidentified long bone of <italic>O. retroversus</italic> described by Enlow has apparently a greater density of primary osteons than the femur of <italic>O. uniformis</italic> and, along with the radius described by <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès (1974)</xref>, it contains some secondary osteons (Haversian substitution) that do not occur in <italic>O. uniformis</italic>. Finally, the radius of <italic>O. retroversus</italic> displays no free medullary cavity (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>C). The latter is occupied by a continuous network of trabeculae, a situation quite distinct from the femoral diaphysis of <italic>O. uniformis</italic>. It seems possible that Ricqlès’ radius section (number 291.1.2 T in this author's collection) was not sampled exactly at the mid-diaphyseal level. Indeed, this section measures 18 by 11 mm in diameter. Comparing with figure 46A and B (ventral and medial views, respectively) of the <italic>O. retroversus</italic> radius in <xref rid="bib0305" ref-type="bibr">Romer and Price (1940)</xref>, these proportions best match the distal metaphysis; in the mid-diaphyseal region, the difference between perpendicular diameters is much smaller.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0090">Among other basal synapsids, the general histological type observed in <italic>O. uniformis</italic> femur is encountered also in the contemporary (Early Permian) sphenacodontids, <italic>Sphenacodon spp</italic>. (<xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Huttenlocker and Rega, 2012</xref>) and <italic>Dimetrodon natalis</italic> (<xref rid="bib0310" ref-type="bibr">Shelton et al., 2013</xref>; see also <xref rid="bib0185" ref-type="bibr">Huttenlocker et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0095">As compared to extant species, the histological structure of the femoral cortex of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> looks remarkably similar to that of large varanids (e.g., <italic>Varanus niloticus</italic>: <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Castanet, 2000</xref>). In both cases, bone matrix is of a parallel-fibered tissue type that tends to turn into the woven-fibered type in depth, and to the lamellar type in periphery, with an abundant network of primary osteons and simple vascular canals. Consistent with the many experimental data that link the histological structure of primary bone deposits with their accretion rate (<xref rid="bib0065" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1996</xref>, <xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref> and <xref rid="bib0110" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2004</xref>), this resemblance would mean that the general dynamics of the radial growth of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> femur was comparable to that of, e.g., the Nile monitor. In ectothermic tetrapods, growth curves derived from the rate of cortical accretion (radial growth of the bones) proved to be reliable indicators of the general growth pattern of an individual (<xref rid="bib0045" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>). Therefore, the similarity in bone structure between <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> and large varanids may indicate relatively comparable growth speeds for the body as a whole (cf. <xref rid="bib0090" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2002</xref> and <xref rid="bib0095" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2007</xref> for <italic>V. niloticus</italic> growth curve). Two differences nevertheless exist between <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> and large varanids. The first is the frequent occurrence of annual growth marks (LAGs or <italic>annuli</italic>) in varanids, whereas such marks are not observed in <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>. This situation may be explained by three distinct, mutually exclusive hypotheses:<list>
                     <list-item id="lsti0005">
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p id="par0100">
                           <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> had a continuous, non-cyclic, growth;</p>
                     </list-item>
                     <list-item id="lsti0010">
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p id="par0105">
                           <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> had a cyclic growth, but our specimen is from an animal that died before the end of its first year;</p>
                     </list-item>
                     <list-item id="lsti0015">
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p id="par0110">some growth marks were once present in deep cortical layers, but were eroded by the expansion of the medullary cavity.</p>
                     </list-item>
                  </list>
               </p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0115">All three hypotheses are possible, though the first one (non-cyclic growth) would designate <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> as an exception among ectothermic tetrapods. The presence of peripheral lamellar tissue in bone cortex indicates that the growth rate of our specimen was strongly decreasing, a sign of possible somatic maturity. The latter could have occurred either before, or after, the age of 1 year, a question that cannot be settled with the data presently available. In some heavily exploited populations of Nile monitors, males and females reach an SVL 35 to 40 cm, along with sexual maturity, by the age of 1 year (<xref rid="bib0090" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2002</xref> and <xref rid="bib0095" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2007</xref>). The hypothetical attribution of similar life history traits to <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> is thus by no means unrealistic. The second difference is relative to the orientation of vascular canals: they are mainly longitudinal in <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>, whereas oblique or radial canals are frequently observed in varanid bones. However, this characteristic is fairly variable between bones, individuals or varanid populations (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Castanet, 2000</xref> and <xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil et al., 2008</xref>), and the possible occurrence of similar variability in <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> cannot be discarded. An interesting comparative element is that monitors species less than 460 mm in adult snout-vent length (SVL) have avascular femoral cortices, as is the case for most other squamates (<xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil et al., 2008</xref> and <xref rid="bib0075" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2014</xref>). The snout-vent length of our specimen was estimated at 333 mm, and histological observations suggest that this individual was an adult approaching the end of its somatic growth. If so, its size was far below the threshold for bone vascularization observed in varanids. Considering the general relationship between bone vascular supply and growth speed (<xref rid="bib0065" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1996</xref>, <xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref> and <xref rid="bib0110" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2004</xref>), this may mean that the <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> growth rate was comparable to that of larger monitors, and was thus faster than that of the varanids of comparable adult size. This possibility seems all the more plausible that the deepest (i.e. ontogenetically earliest) parts of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> cortex, which were obviously deposited at a higher rate than the more peripheral parts, were eroded by perimedullar resorption and are thus not observed in our section. Permo-Carboniferous synapsids had primitive epiphyses (sensu <xref rid="bib0160" ref-type="bibr">Haines, 1942</xref> and <xref rid="bib0165" ref-type="bibr">Haines, 1969</xref>; i.e. epiphyses devoid of secondary ossification centers); the growth of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> could thus have been potentially unlimited, though slow in advanced ontogenetic stages. Recent studies dealing with, e.g., crocodilians (<xref rid="bib0330" ref-type="bibr">Woodward et al., 2011</xref>; see also <xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2003</xref>) nevertheless show that primitive epiphyses are not necessarily indicative of unlimited growth, and that the taxa having this kind of epiphyses actually reach an asymptotic length. However, the latter is delayed and may not be attained before death of most individuals of a given population. For some authors (e.g., <xref rid="bib0235" ref-type="bibr">Lee et al., 2013</xref>), true unlimited growth is likely to be a fictive concept (see also <xref rid="bib0070" ref-type="bibr">Congdon et al., 2013</xref>, on this topic), at least among vertebrates.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0120">The histological traits of bone cortices in <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> are also closer to those observed in varanids and some teids of large size (e.g., <italic>Tupinambis</italic>: <xref rid="bib0075" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2014</xref>), than to those of all other extant ectothermic amniotes. However, the occurrence of ramified, anastomosed vascular canals is unknown in varanids. This feature suggests that growth rate in <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> was somewhat faster than in extant large squamates (see on this topic <xref rid="bib0065" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1996</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0125">Growth rates in the <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> femur studied here was submitted to both cyclic and accidental fluctuations. Histological observations indicate that layers 1 and 3 formed during episodes of fast growth, and layers 2 and 4 during phases of slower growth. These fluctuations are unlikely to result from regular, cyclic processes because layers 2 and 4 (and to a lesser extent layer 3) are themselves subdivided into thinner layers defined by typical cyclic growth marks, the <italic>annuli</italic> and the LAGs that are known to have a basic annual periodicity in most tetrapods (<xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1977</xref> and <xref rid="bib0060" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1993</xref>). If such marks were indeed annual in our <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> specimen, it can be hypothesized that, after an initial active, most likely juvenile, growth stage of unknown duration (accretion of layer 1), the growth of the femur experienced a much lower rate during 4 years (accretion of two annuli and two LAGs in layer 2). A new phase of relatively fast growth succeeded during several years (layer 3), before being itself followed by a final episode of slow (base of layer 4) or very slow (last six cycles) growth that lasted at least about 10 years and ended with the death of the animal. This interpretation suggests that <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> growth presented regular, most probably annual, cycles, in addition to being sensitive to stochastic events likely to reflect environmental variations. These events were able to provoke either a sudden increase (layer 3) in a growth activity that had been basically reduced after the deposit of layer 1, or a double decrease (layers 2 and 4) in an otherwise sustained growth activity evidenced by layer 3. Both alternatives have specific bearings on the general interpretation of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> growth, as developed below.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0130">In layer 2 and the base of layer 4, the spacing of cyclic growth marks is broad and relatively constant. The narrow spacing of LAGs that suddenly occurred in the peripheral region of layer 4 suggests that growth rate decrease was particularly abrupt and pronounced just before the last 6 years of life of the animal. This aspect can be viewed in two different ways:<list>
                     <list-item id="lsti0020">
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p id="par0135">it can reflect the consequences on local bone histology of the attainment of sexual maturity, as described in many ecto-poikilothermic tetrapods (e.g., <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1988</xref> and <xref rid="bib0060" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1993</xref>);</p>
                     </list-item>
                     <list-item id="lsti0025">
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p id="par0140">it can also be interpreted as indicative of the end of fast skeletal growth, at least for the bone and the region of this bone, considered here.</p>
                     </list-item>
                  </list>
               </p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0145">According to the first hypothesis, our <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> specimen may have been an adult that had already completed most of its somatic growth before the onset of sexual maturity, but was still growing at a very low, but regular rate after it. In this interpretation, sexual maturity was relatively late (more than eight years for the present specimen), as is the case for many extant “reptiles”, including, for example, lepidosaurians (<italic>Sphenodon punctatus</italic>; <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1988</xref>), crocodiles (<xref rid="bib0325" ref-type="bibr">Webb et al., 1978</xref>), etc. The alternative hypothesis would postulate that sexual maturity occurred after layer 1 (whatever its duration), and that growth decreased consequently with a short resumption corresponding to the formation of layer 3. The last six (closely spaced) LAGs in layer 4 would then represent an “external fundamental system” (EFS) characteristic of the end of skeletal development in the amniotes, including taxa like the pseudosuchians that are supposed to have potentially unlimited growth (<xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2003</xref> and <xref rid="bib0330" ref-type="bibr">Woodward et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0150">Whatever the hypothesis considered, this study shows that growth activity in our specimen had fallen to a very low, residual level 6 years before the death of the animal. An accretion rate of some 0.14 μm/day, at most, is indeed close to or slightly below the range of accretion speeds (0.2 to 2.8 μm/day) that defines the slowest bone deposits of lamellar tissue (<xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref>). The timing of this quasi-cessation of growth, as compared to the epoch of sexual maturity is an important question for interpreting <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> life history traits. However, settling this problem properly would require a growth series of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> bones, a paleontological material still lacking. In addition, some uncertainty persists in literature about <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> adult size (reviewed in <xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Huttenlocker and Rega, 2012</xref>). This study also suggests that the overall course of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> growth differed from that of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>, in which growth seems to have decelerated more gradually by the end of somatic development.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0055">
            <label>4.2</label>
            <title id="sect0075">Bone compactness profile and lifestyle inference</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0155">The terrestrial lifestyle of both <italic>C. collettii</italic> and <italic>O. uniformis</italic>, suggested by the inference model of <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Quémeneur et al. (2013)</xref> could be viewed as surprising (though not implausible), considering the ancient and widespread opinion that <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> was semi-aquatic. For <italic>C. collettii</italic>, this inference appears intuitively correct, considering the clear tubular structure (a fairly thin, compact cortex and a large, free medullary cavity) of the femur in this taxon. The transition between cortex and medulla is particularly sharp, given that there are only three bone trabeculae in the section sampled at mid-shaft. This type of bone architecture is characteristic of terrestrial tetrapods (<xref rid="bib0230" ref-type="bibr">Laurin et al., 2011</xref>). For <italic>O. uniformis</italic>, we are somewhat less confident in the reliability of the inferred terrestrial lifestyle because the much thicker cortex might also reflect an amphibious lifestyle, rather than a truly terrestrial one. However, considering the greater geological age of <italic>C. collettii</italic> (this species is 15–28 Ma older than <italic>O. uniformis</italic>), if <italic>O. uniformis</italic> was amphibious, this would most likely have resulted from a return to a more aquatic lifestyle, rather than a retention of a primitive link to the aquatic environment as <xref rid="bib0290" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1957</xref> and <xref rid="bib0295" ref-type="bibr">Romer, 1958</xref> hypothesized. Our interpretation is also strengthened by the recent terrestrial lifestyle inference of <italic>Dimetrodon</italic> based on microanatomy (<xref rid="bib0200" ref-type="bibr">Kriloff et al., 2008</xref>). Indeed, an optimization of lifestyle in early amniotes based on the inferences obtained so far from bone microanatomy and our quantitative inference models suggest that the first synapsids were terrestrial (<xref rid="fig0030" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>). A few problems remain, however. Chiefly among these is our previous inference of a fairly aquatic lifestyle for <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> based on Ricqlès’ radius section number 291.1.2 T (<xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin, 2005</xref>). However, as mentioned by <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin (2005)</xref>, the <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> radius was located by the model well outside the distribution polygons, so we had already expressed reservations about that inference. Since the radius section used in that study is likely to have been sampled at some distance from the mid-diaphyseal plane towards the distal metaphysis, this would explain the abundance of spongy bone in the medullary region which led to the inference of a fairly aquatic lifestyle for that taxon. Another potential explanation is interspecific variability, given that the radius is from <italic>O. retroversus</italic> and the femur, from <italic>O. uniformis</italic>. <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">Ricqlès (1974: 10)</xref> had already concluded that <italic>O. retroversus</italic> exhibited “certain adaptations to an aquatic life”, an interpretation based both on the dense vascularization of bone cortex and on the progressive transition from a compact cortex to an abundant medullary spongiosa. So far, the various clues used to infer the lifestyle of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic>, such as taphonomy (<xref rid="bib0305" ref-type="bibr">Romer and Price, 1940</xref>), bone microstructure (<xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin, 2005</xref> and <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès, 1974</xref>), and vertebral anatomy (<xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Felice and Angielczyk, 2014</xref>), proved to be ambiguous or inconclusive. Incomplete resorption of calcified cartilage is a very common and typical feature in tetrapods re-adapting to life in water. However, remnants of this tissue are absent in the medullary trabeculae of our specimen (and were never mentioned by previous authors). This situation raises doubts about the interpretation of some skeletal peculiarities of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> that were simply considered to result from retardation in endochondral ossification due to aquatic life (<xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Reisz, 1986</xref> and <xref rid="bib0305" ref-type="bibr">Romer and Price, 1940</xref>). The present study infers a terrestrial habitat for <italic>O. uniformis</italic>, but some caveats remain to be discussed. Even if an aquatic (or amphibious) lifestyle for <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> cannot be definitely refuted because of its relatively thick cortex, the results of this study confirm that synapsids represent a primitively terrestrial clade (<xref rid="fig0030" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>), and that the eventual aquatic or semi-aquatic lifestyle of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> would be secondary, as already proposed by <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Olson (1941)</xref> for the latest representatives of that taxon. Finally, the proposal by <xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Felice and Angielczyk (2014)</xref> to consider a terrestrial ecology for <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> as a “null hypothesis” in future studies is supported by our results. However, the lifestyle of <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> deserves closer scrutiny.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0160">The optimization of lifestyle in stegocephalians resulting from the use of all inference models based on bone microanatomy (but no other types of data) suggests that a terrestrial lifestyle may have appeared fairly early, by the last common ancestor of <italic>Chroniosaurus</italic>, <italic>Discosauriscus</italic>, and the tetrapod crown-group (<xref rid="fig0030" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>). However, if <italic>Chroniosaurus</italic> is nested within embolomeres, as previously suggested (<xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Buchwitz et al., 2012</xref> and <xref rid="bib0215" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2000</xref>), its terrestrial lifestyle is probably convergent with that of seymouriamorphs and crown-tetrapods (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2010</xref>: fig. 7.1), given that most embolomeres appear to have been fairly aquatic. Unfortunately, we have not yet had the opportunity to apply our inference models to geologically older, more basal embolomeres to test this hypothesis. Similarly, the early return to an amphibious lifestyle at the base of Sauropsida may reflect that low number of sampled taxa, along with the fairly basal position of the aquatic mesosaurs. A denser sampling of all these taxa will be necessary to get a more robust, better-documented scenario of the move onto land by vertebrates. This will be the topic of future contributions.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0165">The synthesis presented here (<xref rid="fig0030" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>) is an attempt at isolating what bone microanatomy suggests, as compared with the indications provided by other kinds of data. Other relevant types of data, such as the presence of lateral-line canals on the skull, the degree of ossification of the endoskeleton, and other criteria, have been detailed elsewhere (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0320" ref-type="bibr">Vallin and Laurin, 2004</xref>); these allow the lifestyle of far more taxa to be inferred, but with caveats that differ from those applying to bone microanatomy. Comparison of the signals provided by these various data types should prove useful to raise questions about established ideas or suspicious results provided by our models, and hence, contribute to progress in this field.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
   </body>
   <back>
      <ack>
         <title id="sect0080">Acknowledgements</title>
         <p id="par0170">We thank Jacques Gauthier, Maryann Turner and Lyndon K, Murray of the Yale Peabody Museum for the loan of the <italic>C. collettii</italic> specimen and permission to section it. We also thank David S Berman and Amy Henrici for the loan of the <italic>C. uniformis</italic> femur and permission to section it. Robert R. Reisz provided some comments that improved the draft and obtained the loan of the <italic>C. uniformis</italic> femur. Finally, we are very grateful to our colleagues, Aurore Canoville and Jennifer Botha-Brink who, as referees, made excellent reviews of our manuscript and suggested useful corrections, and to Kevin Padian, for his linguistic corrections.</p>
      </ack>
      <app-group>
         <app>
            <sec id="sec0065">
               <label>Appendix A</label>
               <title id="sect0090">Supplementary data</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0180">
                     <supplementary-material xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="upi0005" xlink:href="main.assets/mmc1.xls"/>
                  </p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
         </app>
      </app-group>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="bib0005">
            <label>Benson, 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0005" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Benson</surname>
                  <given-names>R.B.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Interrelationships of basal synapsids: cranial and postcranial morphological partitions suggest different topologies</article-title>
               <source>J. Syst. Palaeontol.</source>
               <volume>10</volume>
               <year>2012</year>
               <page-range>601–624</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0010">
            <label>Brand, 1992</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0010" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Brand</surname>
                  <given-names>L.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Reply on “Fossil vertebrate footprints in the Coconino Sandstone (Permian) of northern Arizona: evidence for underwater origin”</article-title>
               <source>Geology</source>
               <volume>20</volume>
               <year>1992</year>
               <page-range>668–670</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0015">
            <label>Brand and Tang, 1991</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0015" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Brand</surname>
                  <given-names>L.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tang</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fossil vertebrate footprints in the Coconino Sandstone (Permian) of northern Arizona: evidence for underwater origin</article-title>
               <source>Geology</source>
               <volume>19</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>1201–1204</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0020">
            <label>Buchwitz et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0020" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Buchwitz</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Foth</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kogan</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Voigt</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On the use of osteoderm features in a phylogenetic approach on the internal relationships of the Chroniosuchia (Tetrapoda: Reptiliomorpha)</article-title>
               <source>Palaeontology</source>
               <volume>55</volume>
               <year>2012</year>
               <page-range>623–640</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0085">
            <label>de Buffrénil and Castanet, 2000</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0085" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Age estimation by skeletochronology in the Nile monitor (<italic>Varanus niloticus</italic>), a highly exploited species</article-title>
               <source>J. Herpetol.</source>
               <volume>34</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>414–424</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0090">
            <label>de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2002</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0090" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hémery</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Variation in longevity, growth and morphology in exploited Nile monitors (<italic>Varanus niloticus</italic>) from Sahelian Africa</article-title>
               <source>J. Herpetol.</source>
               <volume>36</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>419–426</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0095">
            <label>de Buffrénil and Hémery, 2007</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0095" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hémery</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Harvest of the Nile monitor, <italic>Varanus niloticus</italic>, in Sahelian Africa. Part II: life history traits of harvested monitors</article-title>
               <source>Mertensiella</source>
               <volume>16</volume>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>195–217</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0100">
            <label>de Buffrénil et al., 2008</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0100" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Houssaye</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Böhme</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone vascular supply in monitor lizards (Squamata: Varanidae): influence of size, growth and phylogeny</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>269</volume>
               <year>2008</year>
               <page-range>533–543</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0025">
            <label>Calder et al., 2005</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0025" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Calder</surname>
                  <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rygel</surname>
                  <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ryan</surname>
                  <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Falcon-Lang</surname>
                  <given-names>H.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hebert</surname>
                  <given-names>B.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Stratigraphy and sedimentology of Early Pennsylvanian red beds at Lower Cove, Nova Scotia, Canada: the Little River Formation with redefinition of the Joggins Formation</article-title>
               <source>Atl. Geol.</source>
               <volume>41</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>143–167</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0030">
            <label>Canoville and Laurin, 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0030" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Canoville</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Evolution of humeral microanatomy and lifestyle in amniotes, and some comments on paleobiological inferences</article-title>
               <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>100</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>384–406</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0035">
            <label>Carroll, 1964</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0035" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Carroll</surname>
                  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The earliest reptiles</article-title>
               <source>Zool. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>45</volume>
               <year>1964</year>
               <page-range>61–83</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0040">
            <label>Carroll, 1988</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0040" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Carroll</surname>
                  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution</source>
               <year>1988</year>
               <publisher-name>W.H. Freeman</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <comment>(698 p.)</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0045">
            <label>Castanet and Baez, 1991</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0045" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Baez</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Adaptation and evolution in <italic>Gallotia</italic> lizards from the Canary islands: age, growth, maturity and longevity</article-title>
               <source>Amph. Rept.</source>
               <volume>12</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>81–102</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0050">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1977</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0050" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Meunier</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>L’enregistrement de la croissance cyclique par le tissu osseux des poïkilothermes. Données comparatives et essai de synthèse</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg.</source>
               <volume>61</volume>
               <year>1977</year>
               <page-range>183–202</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0055">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1988</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0055" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Newmann</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Saint-Girons</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Squelettochronological data on the growth, age and population structure of the Tuatara, <italic>Sphenodon punctatus</italic>, on Stephens and Lady Alice islands, New Zealand</article-title>
               <source>Herpetologica</source>
               <volume>44</volume>
               <year>1988</year>
               <page-range>25–37</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0060">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1993</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0060" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Francillon-Vieillot</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Meunier</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Riqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Bone and individual aging</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hall</surname>
                  <given-names>B.K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bones 7: Bone Growth</article-title>
               <year>1993</year>
               <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Ann Arbor, Michigan</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>245–283</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0065">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1996</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0065" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Grandin</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Abourachid</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Expression de la dynamique de croissance dans la structure de l’os périostique chez <italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III</source>
               <volume>319</volume>
               <year>1996</year>
               <page-range>301–308</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0070">
            <label>Congdon et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0070" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Congdon</surname>
                  <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gibbons</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brooks</surname>
                  <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rollinson</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tsaliagos</surname>
                  <given-names>R.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Indeterminate growth in long-lived freshwater turtles as a component of individual fitness</article-title>
               <source>Evol. Ecol.</source>
               <volume>27</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>445–459</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0075">
            <label>Cubo et al., 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0075" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Baudin</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Legendre</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Quilhac</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Geometric and metabolic constraints on bone vascular supply in diapsids</article-title>
               <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>112</volume>
               <year>2014</year>
               <page-range>668–677</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0080">
            <label>Davydov et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0080" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Davydov</surname>
                  <given-names>V.I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Korn</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmitz</surname>
                  <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gradstein</surname>
                  <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hammer</surname>
                  <given-names>O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The Carboniferous period</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gradstein</surname>
                  <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmitz</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Geologic Time Scale 2012</article-title>
               <year>2012</year>
               <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>603–651</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0125">
            <label>Enlow and Brown, 1957</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0125" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Enlow</surname>
                  <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brown</surname>
                  <given-names>S.O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part II</article-title>
               <source>Texas J. Sci.</source>
               <volume>9</volume>
               <year>1957</year>
               <page-range>186–214</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0130">
            <label>Felice and Angielczyk, 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0130" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Felice</surname>
                  <given-names>R.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Angielczyk</surname>
                  <given-names>K.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Was <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> (Synapsida, Eupelycosauria) a swimmer? A test using vertebral dimensions</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kammerer</surname>
                  <given-names>C.F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Angielczyk</surname>
                  <given-names>K.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fröbisch</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Early Evolutionary History of the Synapsida</article-title>
               <year>2014</year>
               <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Netherlands</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>25–51</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0135">
            <label>Francillon-Vieillot et al., 1990</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0135" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Francillon-Vieillot</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Géraudie</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Meunier</surname>
                  <given-names>F.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sire</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Zylberberg</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Carter</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends</source>
               <volume>Vol. 1</volume>
               <year>1990</year>
               <publisher-name>Van Nostrand Reinhold</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>471–530</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0140">
            <label>Germain and Laurin, 2005</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0140" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Germain</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Microanatomy of the radius and lifestyle in amniotes (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda)</article-title>
               <source>Zool. Scr.</source>
               <volume>34</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>335–350</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0145">
            <label>Girondot and Laurin, 2003</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0145" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Girondot</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone Profiler: a tool to quantify, model and statistically compare bone section compactness profiles</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>23</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>458–461</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0150">
            <label>Goin and Goin, 1962</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0150" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Goin</surname>
                  <given-names>O.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Goin</surname>
                  <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Amphibian eggs and the montane environment</article-title>
               <source>Evolution</source>
               <volume>16</volume>
               <year>1962</year>
               <page-range>364–371</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0155">
            <label>Gradstein et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0155" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gradstein</surname>
                  <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmitz</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Geologic Time Scale 2012</article-title>
               <year>2012</year>
               <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>
               <comment>(1176 p.)</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0160">
            <label>Haines, 1942</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0160" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Haines</surname>
                  <given-names>R.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The evolution of epiphyses and of endochondral bone</article-title>
               <source>Biol. Rev.</source>
               <volume>17</volume>
               <year>1942</year>
               <page-range>267–292</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0165">
            <label>Haines, 1969</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0165" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Haines</surname>
                  <given-names>R.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Epiphyses and sesamoids</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gans</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Biology of the Reptilia, Morphology A</source>
               <volume>Vol. 1</volume>
               <year>1969</year>
               <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>81–115</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0170">
            <label>Hatch and Affolter, 2002</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0170" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Hatch</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Affolter</surname>
                  <given-names>R.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Chapter C. Geologicl overview</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hatch</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Affolter</surname>
                  <given-names>R.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Resource Assessment of the Springfield, Herrin, Danville, and Baker Coals in the Illinois Basin</article-title>
               <year>2002</year>
               <publisher-name>US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Denver, Colorado</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>C1–C20</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0175">
            <label>Henderson et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0175" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Henderson</surname>
                  <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Davydov</surname>
                  <given-names>V.I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Wardlaw</surname>
                  <given-names>B.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gradstein</surname>
                  <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hammer</surname>
                  <given-names>O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The Permian period</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gradstein</surname>
                  <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmitz</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ogg</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Geologic Time Scale 2012</article-title>
               <year>2012</year>
               <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>653–679</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0180">
            <label>Huttenlocker and Rega, 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0180" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Huttenlocker</surname>
                  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rega</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The paleobiology and bone microstructure of pelycosaurian-grade synapsids</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Chinsamy-Turan</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Forerunners of Mammals: Radiation, Histology, Biology</article-title>
               <year>2012</year>
               <publisher-name>Indiana University Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Indiana</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>90–119</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0185">
            <label>Huttenlocker et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0185" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Huttenlocker</surname>
                  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rega</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Stuart</surname>
                  <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Comparative anatomy and osteology of hyperelongate neural spines in the sphenacodontids <italic>Spenacodon</italic> and <italic>Dimetrodon</italic> (Amniota: Synapsida)</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>271</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>1407–1421</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0190">
            <label>Josse et al., 2006</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0190" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Josse</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Moreau</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Stratigraphic Tools for Mesquite</source>
               <year>2006</year>
               <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://mesquiteproject.org/packages/stratigraphicTools/">http://mesquiteproject.org/packages/stratigraphicTools/</ext-link>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0195">
            <label>Keighley et al., 2008</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0195" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Keighley</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Calder</surname>
                  <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Park</surname>
                  <given-names>A.F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pickerill</surname>
                  <given-names>R.K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Waldron</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Falcon-Lang</surname>
                  <given-names>H.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Benton</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Discussion on ecology of earliest reptiles inferred from basal Pennsylvanian trackways Journal, Vol. 164, 2007, 1113–1118</article-title>
               <source>J. Geol. Soc.</source>
               <volume>165</volume>
               <year>2008</year>
               <page-range>983–987</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0200">
            <label>Kriloff et al., 2008</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0200" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Kriloff</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Germain</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Canoville</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Vincent</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sache</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Evolution of bone microanatomy of the tetrapod tibia and its use in palaeobiological inference</article-title>
               <source>J. Evol. Biol.</source>
               <volume>21</volume>
               <year>2008</year>
               <page-range>807–826</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0205">
            <label>Lance, 2003</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0205" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lance</surname>
                  <given-names>V.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Alligator physiology and life history: the importance of temperature</article-title>
               <source>Exp. Geront.</source>
               <volume>38</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>801–805</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0210">
            <label>Laurin, 1993</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0210" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Anatomy and relationships of <italic>Haptodus garnettensis</italic>, a Pennsylvanian synapsid from Kansas</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>13</volume>
               <year>1993</year>
               <page-range>200–229</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0215">
            <label>Laurin, 2000</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0215" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Seymouriamorphs</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Heatwole</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Carroll</surname>
                  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Amphibian Biology</article-title>
               <year>2000</year>
               <publisher-name>Surrey Beatty &amp; Sons</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Chipping Norton</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>1064–1080</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0220">
            <label>Laurin, 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0220" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>How Vertebrates Left the Water</source>
               <year>2010</year>
               <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>
               <comment>(xv + 199 p.)</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0225">
            <label>Laurin et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0225" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Girondot</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Loth</surname>
                  <given-names>M.-M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The evolution of long bone microanatomy and lifestyle in lissamphibians</article-title>
               <source>Paleobiology</source>
               <volume>30</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>589–613</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0230">
            <label>Laurin et al., 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0230" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Canoville</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Germain</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone microanatomy and lifestyle: a descriptive approach</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Palevol</source>
               <volume>10</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>381–402</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0235">
            <label>Lee et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0235" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lee</surname>
                  <given-names>A.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Huttenlocker</surname>
                  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Woodward</surname>
                  <given-names>H.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Analysis of growth rates</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lamm</surname>
                  <given-names>E.-T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone Histology of Fossil Tetrapods</article-title>
               <year>2013</year>
               <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>217–251</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0240">
            <label>Lucas, 2006</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0240" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lucas</surname>
                  <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Global Permian tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lucas</surname>
                  <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cassinis</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schneider</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology</article-title>
               <year>2006</year>
               <publisher-name>The Geological Society of London</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>65–93</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0245">
            <label>Maddison and Maddison, 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0245" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Maddison</surname>
                  <given-names>W.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Maddison</surname>
                  <given-names>D.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Mesquite: a Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3</source>
               <year>2014</year>
               <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://mesquiteproject.org/">http://mesquiteproject.org</ext-link>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0105">
            <label>de Margerie et al., 2002</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0105" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Margerie</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone typology and growth rate: testing and quantifying “Amprino's rule” in the mallard (<italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>)</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Biologies</source>
               <volume>325</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>221–230</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0110">
            <label>de Margerie et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0110" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Margerie</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Robin</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Verrier</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Groscolas</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Assessing the relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate: a fluorescent labelling study in the king penguin chick (<italic>Aptenodytes patagonicus</italic>)</article-title>
               <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source>
               <volume>207</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>869–879</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0250">
            <label>Martin and Carter, 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0250" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Martin</surname>
                  <given-names>K.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Carter</surname>
                  <given-names>A.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Brave new propagules: terrestrial embryos in anamniotic eggs</article-title>
               <source>Integr. Comp. Biol.</source>
               <volume>53</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>233–247</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0255">
            <label>Niedzwiedzki et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0255" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Niedzwiedzki</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Szrek</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Narkiewicz</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Narkiewicz</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ahlberg</surname>
                  <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland</article-title>
               <source>Nature</source>
               <volume>463</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>43–48</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0260">
            <label>Olson, 1941</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0260" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Olson</surname>
                  <given-names>E.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>New specimens of Permian vertebrates in Walker Museum</article-title>
               <source>J. Geol.</source>
               <volume>49</volume>
               <year>1941</year>
               <page-range>753–763</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0265">
            <label>Prondvai et al., 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0265" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Prondvai</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Stein</surname>
                  <given-names>K.H.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Development-based revision of bone tissue classification: the importance of semantics for science</article-title>
               <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>112</volume>
               <year>2014</year>
               <page-range>799–816</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0270">
            <label>Quémeneur et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0270" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Quémeneur</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Microanatomy of the amniote femur and inference of lifestyle in limbed vertebrates</article-title>
               <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>109</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>644–655</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0275">
            <label>Reisz, 1986</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0275" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Reisz</surname>
                  <given-names>R.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Pelycosauria</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Wellnhofer</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology</article-title>
               <year>1986</year>
               <publisher-name>Gustav Fischer</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Stuttgart</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>1–102</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0280">
            <label>Reisz et al., 1992</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0280" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Reisz</surname>
                  <given-names>R.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Berman</surname>
                  <given-names>D.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Scott</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The cranial anatomy and relationships of <italic>Secodontosaurus</italic>, an unusual mammal-like reptile (Synapsida: Sphenacodontidae) from the Early Permian of Texas</article-title>
               <source>Zool. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>104</volume>
               <year>1992</year>
               <page-range>127–184</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0115">
            <label>de Ricqlès, 1974</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0115" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Recherches paléohistologiques sur les os longs des tétrapodes IV. — Éothériodontes et Pélycosaures</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Paleont.</source>
               <volume>60</volume>
               <year>1974</year>
               <page-range>1–39</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0120">
            <label>de Ricqlès et al., 2003</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0120" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On the bone histology of some Triassic pseudosuchian archosaurs and related taxa</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Paleont.</source>
               <volume>89</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>67–101</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0285">
            <label>Romer, 1946</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0285" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Romer</surname>
                  <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The primitive reptile <italic>Limnoscelis</italic> restudied</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Sci.</source>
               <volume>244</volume>
               <year>1946</year>
               <page-range>149–188</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0290">
            <label>Romer, 1957</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0290" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Romer</surname>
                  <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Origin of the amniote egg</article-title>
               <source>Sci. Mon.</source>
               <volume>85</volume>
               <year>1957</year>
               <page-range>57–63</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0295">
            <label>Romer, 1958</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0295" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Romer</surname>
                  <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Tetrapod limbs and early tetrapod life</article-title>
               <source>Evolution</source>
               <volume>12</volume>
               <year>1958</year>
               <page-range>365–369</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0300">
            <label>Romer, 1961</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0300" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Romer</surname>
                  <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A large ophiacodont pelycosaur from the Pennsylvanian of the Pittsburgh region</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.</source>
               <volume>144</volume>
               <year>1961</year>
               <page-range>1–7</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0305">
            <label>Romer and Price, 1940</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0305" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Romer</surname>
                  <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Price</surname>
                  <given-names>L.I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Review of the Pelycosauria</source>
               <year>1940</year>
               <publisher-name>Arno Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <comment>(538 p.)</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0310">
            <label>Shelton et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0310" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Shelton</surname>
                  <given-names>C.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sander</surname>
                  <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Stein</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Winkelhorst</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Long bone histology indicates sympatric species of <italic>Dimetrodon</italic> (Lower Permian, Sphenacodontidae). Earth Environ</article-title>
               <source>Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edin.</source>
               <volume>103</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>1–20</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0315">
            <label>Skulan, 2000</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0315" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Skulan</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Has the importance of the amniote egg been overstated?</article-title>
               <source>Zool. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>130</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>235–261</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0320">
            <label>Vallin and Laurin, 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0320" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Vallin</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Cranial morphology and affinities of <italic>Microbrachis</italic>, and a reappraisal of the phylogeny and lifestyle of the first amphibians</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>24</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>56–72</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0325">
            <label>Webb et al., 1978</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0325" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Webb</surname>
                  <given-names>G.J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Messel</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Crawford</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Yerbury</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Growth rates of <italic>Crocodylus porosus</italic> (Reptilia: Crocodilia) from Arnhem Land, Northern Australia</article-title>
               <source>Aust. Wildl. Res.</source>
               <volume>5</volume>
               <year>1978</year>
               <page-range>385–399</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0330">
            <label>Woodward et al., 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0330" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Woodward</surname>
                  <given-names>H.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Farlow</surname>
                  <given-names>J.O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Osteohistological evidence for determinate growth in the American alligator</article-title>
               <source>J. Herpetol.</source>
               <volume>45</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>339–342</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
   <floats-group>
      <fig id="fig0005">
         <label>Fig. 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0015">Drawings showing bone microanatomy in the mid-diaphyseal region of the femur of <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> (A) and <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> (B). A section in the radius of <italic>O. retroversus</italic> (reference 291.1.2 T in A. de Ricqlès’ collection) that was used for compactness profile by <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Germain and Laurin (2005)</xref> is also shown for comparison (C). Note the thinner cortex and simpler structure of <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>. These drawings were used for the Bone Profiler analysis to infer the lifestyle of these taxa.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0020">Dessins montrant l’organisation micro anatomique du fémur chez <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> (A) et <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> (B), ainsi que celle du radius d’<italic>O. retroversus</italic> (C). On remarquera que le cortex est plus fin et la structure de l’os plus simple chez <italic>Clepsydrops</italic>. Ces dessins ont d’abord été analysés à l’aide de Bone Profiler, et ont ensuite servi à inférer le mode de vie des trois taxons.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr1.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0010">
         <label>Fig. 2</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0025">(Color online.) Compactness profiles of <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> (A) and <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> (B) femora. The higher value of parameter <italic>P</italic> in <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> reflects its thinner cortex. Similarly, the steeper slope at the inflexion point reflects the simpler structure of its cortex, with an abrupt transition with the medullary region. The red curve (light grey in the print version) represents the compactness profile model based on global values (the whole perimeter), whereas the blue line (darker grey in the print version) represents the profile based on angular values (the average of the values computed on 6 degree-wide sectors). For more information about this distinction, see <xref rid="bib0225" ref-type="bibr">Laurin et al. (2004)</xref>.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0030">(Couleur en ligne.) Profil de compacité du fémur de <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> (A) et d’<italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> (B). La valeur plus élevée du paramètre <italic>P</italic> chez <italic>Clepsydrops</italic> tient à la finesse du cortex. De même, la pente plus accentuée de la courbe au point d’inflexion traduit une structure plus simple du cortex dans ce taxon avec, notamment, une limite tranchée entre cortex et médulla. La courbe rouge (gris pâle dans la version imprimée) représente le profil de compacité fondé sur les valeurs globales (du périmètre entier), alors que la courbe bleue (gris foncé dans la version imprimée) représente le profil établi à partir des valeurs angulaires (moyennes pour des secteurs de 6 degrés). Pour plus d’information sur cette distinction, voir <xref rid="bib0225" ref-type="bibr">Laurin et al. (2004)</xref>.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr2.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0015">
         <label>Fig. 3</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0035">Histology of a <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> femur. A. General aspect of the cortex in cross-sections. The left half: polarized light, right half: ordinary transmitted light. The cortex is nearly monorefringent in depth, and progressively turns to birefringent towards its periphery. B. Aspect of the femoral cortex in a longitudinal section. Polarized, transmitted light. Same comments as for the previous figure. C. Morphology of cell lacunae in the deep (lower right half) and superficial (upper left half) parts of the cortex. In depth, osteocyte lacunae are ovoid with short canaliculi; they are flat without canaliculi in peripheral layers. D. Longitudinal primary osteons disposed in radial rows in the deep cortex. Polarized transmitted light. E. Progressive change in the vascular supply of the bone from depth to periphery. Deep vascularization is composed of numerous primary osteons with a wide lumen. Superficial vascularization is meager, with fewer thin-diameter simple vascular canals. F. Local, perimedullar resorption (arrows) in the femur. G and H. Moderately remodeled bone trabeculae protruding into the medullary cavity (MC).</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0040">Histologie du fémur de <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic>. A. Aspect général du cortex en coupe transversal. La moitié gauche est vue en lumière polarisée, la droite en lumière ordinaire transmise. Le cortex est quasi monoréfringent en profondeur, et devient progressivement biréfringent vers la périphérie. B. Aspect du cortex fémoral en section longitudinale. Lumière polarisée transmise. Voir les commentaires de la partie A. C. Morphologie des lacunes ostéocytaires dans les parties profonde (moitié droite) et superficielle (moitié gauche) du cortex. En profondeur, les logettes ostéocytaires sont ovoïdes et montrent de courts canalicules ; elles sont plates et sans canalicules dans les couches périphériques. D. Ostéones primaires longitudinaux disposés en rangées radiales dans le cortex profond. Lumière polarisée transmise. E. Changement progressif de la vascularisation osseuse de la profondeur vers la périphérie. La vascularisation profonde est formée de nombreux ostéones primaires à large lumière. La vascularisation superficielle est plus clairsemée, avec des canaux vasculaires simples de petit diamètre. F. Résorption périmédullaire locale (flèches) dans le fémur. G et H. Travées modérément remaniées faisant saillie dans la cavité médullaire (MC).</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr3.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0020">
         <label>Fig. 4</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0045">Histology of an <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic> femur. A. General view of the cortex showing stratification into four broad layers numbered 1 to 4. B. Differences in vascularization and birefringence properties between, on the one hand, layers 1 and 3 and, on the other hand, layers 2 and 4. Layers 1 and 3 are abundantly vascularized by large oblique and longitudinal simple canals, while layers 2 and 4 are less vascularized by scarce and thin canals. C. Simple vascular canals (asterisks) and primary osteons (arrows) in the cortex. Bone matrix is of a rough parallel-fibered type and contains many longitudinal vascular canals. D. Morphology of cell lacunae in layers 2 and 4 (left), and layers 1 and 3 (right). E. Rough mass birefringence of bone matrix in the cortex. Transmitted polarized light. F. General view of the cortex showing cyclical growth marks (<italic>annuli</italic> and lines of arrested growth, or LAGs) in layers 2 and 4, but no clearly characterized marks in layers 1 and 3. G. Growth mark count. Layer 2 contains two annuli (asterisks) and two LAGs (arrowheads), while layer 4 has 9 obvious LAGs. The last 6 marks in layer 4 are tightly grouped.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0050">Histologie du fémur d’<italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>. A. Vue générale du cortex montrant sa stratification en quatre couches numérotées de 1 à 4. B. Différence de vascularisation et de réfringence entre, d’une part, les couches 1 et 3 et, d’autre part, les couches 2 et 4. Les couches 1 et 3 sont abondamment vascularisées par de gros canaux primaires obliques ou longitudinaux, alors que les couches 2 et 4 ne sont vascularisées que par de rares canaux de petit diamètre. C. Canaux vasculaires simples (astérisques) et ostéones primaires (flèches) dans le cortex. La matrice osseuse est, globalement, du type « à fibres parallèles » et contient de nombreux canaux vasculaires longitudinaux. D. Morphologie des lacunes ostéocytaires dans les couches 2 et 4 (à gauche) et 1 et 3 (à droite). E. Biréfringence globale de la matrice osseuse dans le cortex. Lumière polarisée transmise. F. Vue générale du cortex montrant des marques de croissance cycliques (<italic>annuli</italic> et lignes d’arrêt de croissance) dans les couches 2 et 4, mais également l’absence de telles marques, nettement définies, dans les couches 1 et 3. G. Dénombrement des marques de croissance. La couche 2 contient deux <italic>annuli</italic> (astérisques) et deux lignes d’arrêt de croissance (pointes de flèches), alors que la couche 4 compte neuf LACs, dont les six dernières sont très resserrées.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr4.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0025">
         <label>Fig. 5</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0055">(Color online.) Sub-periosteal apposition rates during the last six growth cycles of the <italic>Ophiacodon</italic> specimen. The thickness of the bone layer deposited during each cycle (designated by an arrow), as well as the cortical apposition rate (cycles are supposed to have an annual periodicity), suddenly collapse after the accretion of cycle 0. This abrupt decrease in growth can be interpreted either as consecutive of the onset of sexual maturity, or as an indication of the end of somatic fast growth, cycles 1–6 then forming an external fundamental system (also called external circumferential lamellae).</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0060">(Couleur en ligne.) Vitesse d’accrétion sous-périostique durant les six derniers cycles de croissance chez le spécimen d’<italic>Ophiacodon</italic>. L’épaisseur de la couche osseuse déposée lors de chaque cycle (désignée ici par une flèche), ainsi que la vitesse d’apposition (les cycles sont supposés de périodicité annuelle), s’effondrent brusquement après l’accrétion du cycle 0. Cette décroissance rapide peut être vue soit comme une conséquence de l’accession de l’animal à la maturité sexuelle, soit comme une indication de la fin de la croissance somatique rapide, les cycles 1 à 6 représentant alors un système fondamental externe.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr5.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0030">
         <label>Fig. 6</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0065">(Color online.) Optimization of lifestyle of early stegocephalians based on bone microanatomy. Hatching on the branch leading to <italic>Ophiacodon retroversus</italic> indicates substantial uncertainty resulting from the possibly metaphyseal level of the radius cross-section used for that reference. This figure is based on a screen capture in Mesquite 3.0 (<xref rid="bib0245" ref-type="bibr">Maddison and Maddison, 2014</xref>) with the stratigraphic scale superposed using the Stratigraphic Tools (<xref rid="bib0190" ref-type="bibr">Josse et al., 2006</xref>). For higher extant taxa, only the inferred primitive lifestyle (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0320" ref-type="bibr">Vallin and Laurin, 2004</xref>) is shown; subsequent ecological diversification (such as an aquatic lifestyle for several extant mammals) is not shown because it is not relevant to inferring the history of habitat shifts in the Paleozoic.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0070">(Couleur en ligne.) Optimisation du mode de vie des stégocéphales anciens, fondée sur la micro-anatomie osseuse. La texture hachurée sur la branche menant à <italic>Ophiacodon retroversus</italic> indique une incertitude substantielle, liée au niveau potentiellement métaphysaire de la section transversale de radius utilisée pour cette inférence. Image fondée sur une capture d’écran de Mesquite 3.0 (<xref rid="bib0245" ref-type="bibr">Maddison et Maddison, 2014</xref>) avec superposition de l’échelle stratigraphique grâce aux « Stratigraphic Tools » (<xref rid="bib0190" ref-type="bibr">Josse et al., 2006</xref>). Pour les taxons actuels de rang supérieur, seul le mode de vie primitif inféré (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Laurin, 2010</xref> ; <xref rid="bib0320" ref-type="bibr">Vallin et Laurin, 2004</xref>) est montré ; leur diversification écologique ultérieure (comme le mode de vie aquatique de certains mammifères) n’est pas montrée, car elle n’est pas pertinente pour inférer l’histoire des changements d’habitats pendant le Paléozoïque.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr6.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <table-wrap id="tbl0005">
         <label>Table 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0075">Compactness profile parameters of ophiacodontid femora obtained by Bone Profiler (<xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Girondot and Laurin, 2003</xref>) version 4.5.8. Estimated snout-vent length for the two specimens analyzed: 333 mm for <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> and 667 mm for <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0080">Paramètres du profil de compacité obtenu par Bone Profiler (<xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Girondot et Laurin, 2003</xref>) version 4.5.8. Longueur museau-cloaque estimée pour les deux spécimens étudiés : 333 mm pour <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic> et 667 mm pour <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>.</p>
         </caption>
         <oasis:table xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">
            <oasis:tgroup cols="6">
               <oasis:colspec colname="col1"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col2"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col3"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col4"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col5"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col6"/>
               <oasis:thead valign="top">
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Taxon</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Parameter</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Mean global value</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">SD global value</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Mean angular value</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">SD angular value</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:thead>
               <oasis:tbody>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="left">
                        <italic>Clepsydrops collettii</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Min</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.007</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Max</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">1.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">1.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.002</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>S</italic>: 1/Slope</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.012</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.006</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.012</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>P</italic>: transition</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.751</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.747</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.027</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="left"/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="left">
                        <italic>Ophiacodon uniformis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Min</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Max</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.997</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.996</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.010</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>S</italic>: 1/Slope</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.047</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.023</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.017</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>P</italic>: transition</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.447</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.000</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.459</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="char" char=".">0.051</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:tbody>
            </oasis:tgroup>
         </oasis:table>
      </table-wrap>
   </floats-group>
</article>